As per case facts, the claimants, a husband and his minor son, sought compensation for the death of S. Radhamma in a motor vehicle accident. The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal ... awarded compensation, but the claimants, dissatisfied with the amount, filed an appeal, arguing that the deceased's income from two hospitals should have been considered, warranting a higher compensation. The insurance company countered that the awarded compensation was excessive and that the claims regarding employment in two hospitals were unrealistic. The question arose whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was just and reasonable or required enhancement. Finally, the High Court found that the deceased's income and future prospects were underestimated. It reassessed her monthly income, added future prospects, and after deducting personal expenses, recalculated the loss of dependency using an appropriate multiplier. The Court also increased compensation under the heads of spousal and parental consortium, as well as for funeral expenses and loss of estate, significantly enhancing the total compensation and modifying the initial award.