Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
As per case facts, the petitioner-wife filed a Transfer Petition seeking dissolution of marriage under Article 142 of the Constitution, citing irretrievable breakdown after living separately for over a decade
...following 65 days of cohabitation. Both parties were involved in numerous litigations, and mediation attempts failed. The respondent-husband opposed the divorce and accused the petitioner of false cases and perjury. The question arose whether the Supreme Court could grant divorce under Article 142 in cases of irretrievable breakdown, even if one spouse objected. Finally, the Supreme Court invoked Article 142, dissolving the marriage due to irretrievable breakdown and noting the absence of any alimony claim by the wife. Most other pending matrimonial cases were disposed of, with specific perjury applications allowed to continue.
This is a faithful reproduction of the official record from the e-Courts Services portal, extracted for research.
To ensure "Contextual Integrity," all AI insights must be cross-referenced with the official PDF,
which remains the sole authoritative version for judicial purposes.
This platform provides research aids, not legal advice; verify all content against the official Court Registry before legal use.
Legal Notes
Add a Note....