As per case facts, a petitioner challenged certain Regulations framed by a University's Board of Management, contending they were invalid because the subject matter (like admissions, courses, and academic distinctions) ...
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 1 of 19
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ Date of Decision: 10.03.2026
% W.P.(C) 17131/2025
ASSOCIATION OF GAZETTED OFFICERS TECHNICAL
EDUCATION DELHI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Praveen Swarup, Adv. (through
VC)
versus
THE CHIEF SECRETARY GNCT OF DELHI
AND ORS. .....Respondents
Through: Mr. Dhruv Rohatgi, Panel Counsel,
GNCTD with Ms. Chandrika
Sachdeva, Mr. Dhruv Kumar, Advs.
with Mr. B.S. Rawat, CI, DTTE for
R-1, R-3 and R-4.
Mr. Shivendra Singh, Ms. Prakriti
Rastogi, Ms. Aryama Singh Rajpur,
Advs. for R-2.
CORAM:
HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIA
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ. (ORAL)
CM APPL. 70449/2025
1.Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
2.The application stands disposed of.
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 2 of 19
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 & CM APPL. 70448/2025
3.Proceedings of this petition, instituted under Article 226 of the
Constitution of India challenge the validity of the Regulations/ Notification
1(1), 2A, 2B, 3A, 3B, 3C framed by the Board of Management of the
respondent – University vide its decision taken at agenda Items 11.4.1 and
11.4.5 in its meeting held on 30.09.2024. Apart from challenging the said
decision of the Board of Management whereby certain Regulations have
been framed, the petitioner has also prayed that a direction be issued to the
respondents to cease all ongoing admissions to various academic
programmes launched in accordance with the impugned Regulations.
Another prayer made in the petition is that a direction be issued for fixing
the personal accountability of the members of the Board of Management and
officers responsible for the impugned decision and for recovery of losses
caused to the public exchequer on account of the impugned decision of the
Board of Management.
4.The impugned Regulation 2A provides for introducing a Choice
Based Credit System, Semester System, Multiple Entry and Exit,
Continuous Assessment and Grading System in the light of National
Education Policy 2020 in the respondent – University from the academic
session 2024-25 onwards.
5.As averred in the petition, Regulation 2B provides for establishing
Board of Studies and Committees of Courses.
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 3 of 19
6.Regulation 3A, 3B and 3C pertain to provisions relating to Diploma,
Four-Year Bachelor's and Postgraduate programmes of the respondent –
University.
7.It has been contended by learned counsel for the petitioner -
Association of Gazetted Officers Technical Education, Delhi that the subject
matter on which the impugned Regulations have been framed are covered by
Section 31 of The Delhi Skill and Entrepreneurship University Act, 2019
(hereinafter referred to as ‘the 2019 Act’) and, therefore, any prescription in
relation to the said subjects could be made by the University only by
framing Ordinances and not by framing Regulations. It is, thus, the
submission on behalf of the petitioner that unless and until Ordinances are
framed in accordance with the requirement of Section 31 and other
provisions of the 2019 Act, the impugned Regulation would not be valid on
the subject matters on which the same have been framed.
8.Drawing our attention to Section 31 of the 2019 Act, it has been
contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that Section 31 enlists the
subjects on which Ordinances are to be framed, which include the subjects
relating to admission of students, the courses of study, qualification
pertaining to award of degrees and diplomas and other academic distinctions
etc.
9.It is further submitted that since the subject matter of the impugned
Regulations categorically fall within the subjects as enlisted in Section
31(1)(a) of the 2019 Act, anything which the University intends to provide
for in relation to the said subjects, could be provided for only by making the
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 4 of 19
Ordinances and not by making the Regulations. It is also the submission on
behalf of the petitioner that in terms of Section 31(2), the first Ordinances
are to be made by the Vice-Chancellor with the prior approval of the
Government and the Ordinances so made may be amended, repealed or
added to, at any time by the Board in such manner as may be prescribed and
since, in the instant case, the impugned provisions as contained in the
Regulations were never framed with the prior approval of the Government,
the same cannot be given effect to, being contrary to the provision of
Section 31(2) of the 2019 Act.
10.It is also the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that as
mandated by Section 8 of the 2019 Act, the training and teaching in
connection with the degree, diploma and certificate programmes of the
University shall be conducted in accordance with the Ordinances and
Regulations and since the subject matters which are covered by the
impugned Regulations are enlisted in Section 31 of the 2019 Act, no such
Regulation could be framed and such matters could be provided for only by
framing the Ordinances. It has also been argued that as per Section 8 (2) of
the 2019 Act, courses and curricula and the authorities responsible for
organizing the training and teaching of such courses and curricula are to be
prescribed by Ordinances and not by Regulations.
11.Our attention has also been drawn to Section 45 of the 2019 Act,
according to which, all the Ordinances framed by the University are to be
published in the Official Gazette and are to be laid before the State
Legislature and since, in the instant case, the impugned Regulations were
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 5 of 19
neither published in the Official Gazette nor were they laid before the State
Legislature, the same are illegal being contrary to the requirement of Section
45 of the 2019 Act.
12.It is also the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that
Section 53 of the 2019 Act, vests certain powers in the Government for
annulment of the orders of the University and since, in the instant case, the
impugned Regulations are void ab initio, the Government ought to have
annulled such Regulations and by not doing so, the illegally framed
Regulations are being continued in terms of which various courses and
studies are being run by the University which is also not lawful.
13.Referring to Section 2(ae) of the 2019 Act, learned counsel for the
petitioner has stated that ‘Notification’ in the said provision has been
defined to mean a notification published in the official Gazette and since the
impugned Regulations have not been published in the Official Gazette,
therefore, in absence of such publication in the Official Gazette, the
Regulations cannot be given effect to, being contrary to Section 2(ae) of the
2019 Act.
14.Opposing the writ petition, learned counsel for the respondent
University has submitted that the entire writ petition is based on an absolute
misconceived premise for the reason that the provisions which are impugned
in the instant writ petition are not Ordinances rather, the same are
Regulations, which have been framed in accordance with the provisions
contained in Section 32 of the 2019 Act and, therefore, there was no
requirement of such Regulations either being placed before the State
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 6 of 19
Legislature or seeking prior approval of the Government before they were
framed.
15.Learned counsel representing the respondent University has also
submitted that Section 8 of 2019 Act provides that training and teaching in
connection with the degree, diploma and certificate programmes of the
University can be conducted not only in accordance with the Ordinances but
also in accordance with the Regulations as well, as is clear from such
prescription available in Section 8 of the 2019 Act.
16.He has also stated and vehemently argued that Section 32 permits the
Board of Management of the University to frame Regulations on the
subjects on which there does not exist any provision either in the Act or the
Statutes or the Ordinances. His submission is that Section 32 vests adequate
power upon the authorities of the University to frame Regulations for
conduct of the business of the University if the same is not provided for by
the Act or the Statute or the Ordinances. It is further his case that since on
subject matter on which the impugned Regulations have been framed,
nothing has been provided for either by the Act or the Statutes or the
Ordinances, it was legally open to the University to have taken recourse to
framing of the Regulations in terms of Section 32 of the 2019 Act and,
therefore, there is no illegality in the said Regulations.
17.We have considered the submission made by learned counsel for the
respective parties and have also perused the records available before us on
this writ petition.
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 7 of 19
18.The State Legislature has enacted the 2019 Act to provide for quality
education in Applied Sciences and skill education and various other
disciplines of education. The term ‘Board’ has been defined in Section 2(c)
of the 2019 Act which means the Board of Management of the University.
Section 2(c) of the 2019 Act is quoted hereunder:
“2. Definitions: - In this Act, unless the context otherwise
requires –
(a) ……..
(b) ……..
(c)"Board" means the Board of Management of the University;
x x x”
19.Section 22 of the 2019 Act provides that the Board of Management
shall be the principal executive authority of the University and will have all
powers necessary to administer the University, however, such powers are
only subject to provisions of the Act and the Statutes made under the Act. It
also provides that the Board of Management may make Ordinances and
Regulations for the purposes of conducting its business. Section 22(1) of the
2019 Act is quoted hereunder:
“22. The Board of Management-(1) The Board of Management shall be
the principal executive authority of the University and, as such, shall have
all powers necessary to administer the University subject to the provisions
of this Act and the Statutes made there under, and may make Ordinances
and Regulations for that purpose and also with respect to matters
provided hereunder;
20.Section 29 of the 2019 Act provides for Statutes and enlists certain
subject matters on which Statutes can be made. Section 29 of the 2019 Act
is quoted herein below:
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 8 of 19
“29. Statutes:-Subject to the provision of this Act, the Statutes may
provide for all or any of the following matters, namely-
(a) the constitution, powers and functions of the authorities and other
bodies of the University, as may be found necessary to be constituted from
time to time;
(b) the selection and continuance in office of the members of the
authorities and bodies of the University, the filling up of vacancies of
members and all other matters relating thereto which the university may
deem necessary or desirable to provide;
(c) the appointing and disciplinary authorities for all Group employees
teaching and non-teaching employees of the University;
(d) the composition of Selection Committees for direct recruitment in
respect of Group A (teaching and non- teaching) and other services for all
Groups A, B and C teaching and non-teaching employees of the
University;
(e) terms and conditions for continuation of the teachers and other
employees in the employment shall be such as may be prescribed;
(f)the manner of appointment of the officers of the University, terms and
conditions of their service, their powers and duties and emoluments;
(g) the manner of appointment of the teachers of the University, other
academic staff, and other employees and their emoluments;
(h) the manner of appointment of teachers and other academic staff
working in any other University/Industry for a specified period for
undertaking a joint project, their terms and conditions of service and
emoluments;
(i) the terms and conditions of service of the teachers and other members
of the academic staff appointed by the University;
(j) the terms and conditions of other employees appointed by the
University;
(k) the constitution of the pension or the provident fund and the
establishment of an insurance scheme for the benefit of the employees of
the University;
(l) the principles governing the seniority of employees of the University;
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 9 of 19
(m) the procedure for any appeal by an employee or a student of the
University;
(n) conferment of honorary degrees;
(o) institution of fellowships, scholarships, studentship, medals, prizes and
other incentives;
(p) maintenance of discipline among the employees of the University;
(q)establishment of chairs, schools and institutions;
(r) management, supervision and inspection of institutions and centers
established and maintained by the University;
(s) the delegation of powers vested in the authorities or the officers of the
University;
(t) all other matter which, by or under this Act, are to be, or may be,
provided for by the Statutes;”
21.In terms of the provisions of Section 30 of the 2019 Act, the first
Statutes shall be those made by the Government with the prior approval of
the Chancellor. Sub-Section (2) of Section 30 of the 2019 Act empowers
the Board of Management to make new or additional Statutes and amend or
repeal the Statues made under Sub-Section (1). Sub-Section (3) of Section
30 provides that every new Statute or addition to the Statutes or any
amendment or repeal thereof shall require the approval of the Chancellor,
who may assent thereto or withhold his assent or remit it to the Board for
reconsideration. Sub-Section (4) of Section 30 provides that a new Statute
amending or repealing an existing Statute shall not be valid unless it has
received the assent of the Chancellor. Sub-Section (4) of Section 30 of the
2019 Act is also extracted hereunder:
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 10 of 19
“30. Statutes how made:- (1) The first Statutes shall be those made by the
Government with the prior approval of the Chancellor within sixty days of
the commencement of this Act.
(2) The Board may, from time to time, make new or additional Statutes or
may amend or repeal the Statutes referred to in sub-section (I):
Provided that the Board shall not make, amend or repeal any Statutes
affecting the status, powers or constitution of any authority of the
University until such authority has been given a reasonable opportunity of
expressing its opinion in writing on the proposed change and any option
so expressed within the time specified by the Board has been considered
by the Board.
(3) Every new Statute or addition to the Statutes or any amendment or
repeal thereof shall require the approval of the Chancellor, who may
assent thereto or withhold his assent or remit it to the Board for
reconsideration in the light of the observations, if any, made by him.
(4) A new Statute or a Statute amending or repealing an existing Statute
shall not be valid unless it has received the assent of the Chancellor, who
will take into consideration the views of the concerned department while
deciding the matter.”
22.Apart from the Statutes, the 2019 Act provides for making of
Ordinances as well in Section 31. Section 31 enlists certain subjects on
which Ordinances can be made by the University. Section 31 of the 2019
Act reads as under:
“31. Ordinances -( 1) Subject to the provisions of this Act and the
Statutes, the Ordinances may provide for all or any of the following
matters, namely:-
(a) the admission of students, the courses of study and the fees therefore,
the qualifications pertaining to the award of degrees and diplomas and
other academic distinctions, the conditions for the grant of fellowship and
awards and the like;
(b) the conduct of examinations, including the terms and conditions of
office and appointment of examiners;
(c) the conditions of residence of students and their general discipline;
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 11 of 19
(d) the management of institutions, schools and centers maintained by the
University;
(e) the procedures for the settlement of disputes between the employees
and the University, or between the students and the University;
(f) the procedures for the settlement of disputes between the employees
and students;
(g) the procedure for any appeal by an aggrieved employee or a student;
(h) maintenance of discipline among the students of the University;
(i) regulation of the conduct and duties of the employees of the University
and regulation of the conduct of the students of the University;
(j) the categories of misconduct for which action may be taken under this
Act or the Statutes or the Ordinances;
(k) any other matter which, by or under this Act or the Statutes, is to be, or
may be, provided for by the Ordinances.
(2) The first Ordinances shall be made by the Vice-Chancellor with the
prior approval of the Government and the Ordinances so made may be
amended, repealed or added to, at any time by the Board in such manner
as may be prescribed;”
23.A perusal of Section 31(1)(a) of 2019 Act reveals that the Ordinances
can be made in relation to admission of students, courses of study and the
fee therefor, the qualifications pertaining to award of degree and diplomas
and other academic distinctions etc.
24.The University, apart from having powers to frame Statutes and
Ordinances, has also been vested with the authority to frame Regulations
under Section 32 of the 2019 Act, which provides that the University may
make Regulations, which should be consistent with the Act, Statutes and the
Ordinances and Regulations should be made in the manner prescribed by the
Statutes, for the conduct of the business of the University and also conduct
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 12 of 19
of business of the Committees, if any, appointed by the University, and not
provided for by the Act, the Statutes or the Ordinances.
25.Section 32 of the Act 2019 reads as under :
“32. Regulations:- The authorities of the University may make regulations
consistent with this Act, the Statutes and the Ordinances, in the manner
prescribed by the Statutes for the conduct of their own business and that of
the committees, if any, appointed by them and not provided for by this Act,
the Statutes or the Ordinances.”
26.Section 45 of the 2019 Act mandates that all the Statutes and
Ordinances framed by the University are to be published in the Official
Gazette and are also to be laid before the Legislature. Section 45 of the
2019 Act runs as under:
“45. Statutes and Ordinances to be published in the official Gazette and
to be laid before the Legislature:-
(1) Every Statute and Ordinance made under this Act shall be
published in the official Gazette.
(2) Every Statute and Ordinance made under this Act shall be laid, as
soon as may be after it is made, before the House of the Legislative
Assembly of Delhi while it is in session for a total period of thirty days
which may be comprised in one session or two or more successive
sessions, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the
session or the successive sessions aforesaid, the House agrees in making
any modification in the Statute or the Ordinance or the House agrees that
the Statute or the Ordinance, as the case may be, should not be made, the
Statute or the Ordinance shall thereafter have effect only in such modified
form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such
modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of
anything previously done under that Statute or Ordinance as the case may
be.”
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 13 of 19
27.From the perusal of the scheme of the Act and as discussed above,
what we find is that for the purpose of conducting the business and affairs of
the University, apart from the provisions of the Act, various delegated
legislations can also be framed by the University which are (i) Statutes, (ii)
Ordinances, and (iii) Regulations.
28.The procedure for making the Statues and the Ordinances has been
laid down in Sections 29, 30, 31 read with Section 45 of the 2019 Act.
Apart from the Statues and Ordinances, as already observed above, the
University has been vested with the authority to frame Regulations for
conduct of business that are not provided for either by the Act or by the
Statues or by the Ordinances.
29.Differently put, we can safely observe that if a provision has not been
provided for either by the Act or the Statute or the Ordinances, Regulations
can be framed under Section 32 of the 2019 Act. Section 32 clearly
empowers the University to frame Regulations for conduct of its business
and affairs and also the business and affairs of the Committees constituted
by the University, which are not provided for by the Act or the Statute or the
Ordinances.
30.Though, Section 31(1)(a) of the 2019 Act enlists, amongst others, the
subjects relating to admission of students, courses of study and
qualifications pertaining to the award of degrees, diplomas and other
academic distinctions on which an Ordinance may be framed by the
University, however, if no such Ordinance has been framed, it is always
open, in our considered view, for the University to frame Regulations for
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 14 of 19
the same.
31.The impugned Regulations, which have been challenged in this
petition provide for implementation of Choice Based Credit System,
Semester System, Continuous Assessment and Grading System etc., which
may fall in the subjects as listed in Section 31(1) of the 2019 Act, however,
if no Ordinance has been framed, the Regulations can be framed as there is
no bar in the Act to frame Regulations in a situation where no Ordinances
have been framed on such subjects.
32.Accordingly, the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that
the subject matters, which are covered by the impugned Regulations could
be regulated only by framing Ordinances, in our considered opinion, is
highly misconceived. Ordinarily, the Ordinances are to be made on the
subject matters enlisted in Section 31(1) of the 2019 Act, however, if no
such Ordinance as per Section 31(1) of the 2019 Act is in existence or no
such Ordinance has been made, in our considered opinion, it is always open
to the University to frame Regulations regulating its business.
33.The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that since the
subject matter on which the impugned Regulations have been framed are
enlisted in Section 31, therefore, those subject matters can be regulated only
by framing Ordinances, in our opinion, is not tenable for the reason that
ordinarily Ordinances should be made, however, in case no such Ordinance
is in existence or has been made, the same can be regulated by framing
Regulations.
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 15 of 19
34.It is also to be noticed that as per the provisions contained in Section
22 of the 2019 Act, it is the Board of Management which is the principal
executive authority of the University which has all the powers necessary to
administer the University, albeit such powers are subject to provisions of the
Act and the Statutes. The Board is empowered to make Ordinances and
Regulations for the purposes of administering the affairs of the University.
35.If we consider the submissions made by learned counsel for the
petitioner in light of what has been discussed herein above, what we find is
that the impugned provisions are, in fact, Regulations and not Statutes or
Ordinances and, therefore, there is no requirement in terms of Section 45 of
the 2019 Act for placing such Regulations before the State Legislature or
even publishing the same in the Official Gazette.
36.Much emphasis has been laid on behalf of the petitioner on the
provisions contained in Section 8 of the 2019 Act for urging that courses and
curricula shall be as prescribed by Ordinances and since the impugned
Regulations touch various courses and academic programmes being offered
by the respondent – University, provisions in relation thereto can be
prescribed only by making Ordinances and not by making Regulations.
37.For appreciating the aforesaid submissions, we need to note Section 8,
which is extracted herein below:-
“8.Training and Teaching in the University:- (1) The training
and teaching in connection with the degree, diploma and
certificate programmes of the University shall be conducted in
accordance with the Ordinances and Regulations;
(2) The courses and curricula and the authorities responsible for
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 16 of 19
organizing the training and teaching of such courses and
curricula shall be as prescribed by the Ordinances;”
38.A perusal of the aforequoted provisions of Section 8 reveal that in
terms of Section 8(1) the training and teaching in connection with degree,
diploma or certificate programmes of the University shall be conducted in
accordance with the Ordinances and Regulations. That is to say, so far as
the training and teaching in connection with grant of a degree, diploma or
certificate by the University is concerned, provisions for such training and
teaching can be made by framing either Ordinances or Regulations. Sub-
Section 2 of Section 8 provides that courses and curricula shall be as
prescribed by the Ordinances. It also states that the authorities responsible
for organizing the training and teaching of courses and curricula can be
prescribed by the Ordinances. The submission on behalf of the petitioner is
that it is only by a prescription made in an Ordinance that courses and
curricula and the authorities responsible for organizing the training and
teaching of such courses can be regulated and not by making Regulations.
The question which, thus, arises for our consideration in the wake of the said
argument is as to whether the impugned Regulations prescribe courses or
curricula or they prescribe for authorities responsible for organizing the
training and teaching of such courses and curricula.
39.Regulation 2-A, as observed above has been framed by the Board of
Management of the respondent – University for implementation of Choice
Based Credit System, Semester System, Multiple Entry and Exit,
Continuous Assessment and Grading System in the light of National
Education Policy 2020 from the Academic Session 2024-25. The said
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 17 of 19
Regulation further classifies the Academic Programmes offered by the
respondent – University. It also provides as to when the Academic Session
of the University shall begin and when will it end, and that the Academic
Session shall be divided into two Full Semesters and a Short Summer
Semester. It also provides that curriculum and scheme of examination of
any academic programme shall be based on Choice Based Credit System,
Semester System, Multiple Entry and Exit Options, Continuous Assessment
and End of Semesters Evaluation and Grading System. It, however, does
not prescribe any curriculum.
40.Regulation 2-A further provides that curriculum including the
syllabus of each component of an academic programme leading to award of
an academic qualification shall be designed by the University to facilitate its
students with plenty of choices of courses to choose from and their own
learning path in a flexible manner involving multiple entry and exits. The
Regulation, however, does not in itself prescribes the curriculum; it only
broadly prescribes as to how the curriculum and syllabus shall be developed.
Accordingly, so far as the impugned Regulation 2-A is concerned, the same
in our opinion is not governed by Sub-Section 2 of Section 8, rather it
pertains to subject as to how training and teaching in connection with the
academic qualification shall be conducted.
41.As already noticed above, such measures relating to how the training
and teaching in connection with the academic qualification is to be
conducted can be provided both by the Ordinances and Regulations as
provided under Sub-Section 1 of Section 8 of the 2019 Act. As regards
Regulation 3-A, we may notice that the said Regulation pertains to a three
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 18 of 19
years (six semesters) diploma in a major discipline to be ordered by the
University. It provides for number of seats in each such programme,
enrolment of student, medium of instructions and eligibility criteria for
enrolment in three years diploma (technical programme) etc. It also
provides for distribution of credits.
42.So far as the Regulation 3-B is concerned, the same pertains to three
years and four years bachelors’ degree programmes in a major or minor
discipline, run by the University. It also prescribes the number of seats in
each such programmes, enrolment of students, medium of instructions,
multiple entry and exit options to the students and distribution of credits to
be earned by the students etc. Similarly Regulation 3-C makes such
prescriptions in relation to two years Master’s Programme in a major
discipline, two years Masters Programme in Business Administration and
one year M.S/M.Tech Programme conducted by the University. Like
Regulation 3-A and 3-B which prescribe for running three years Diploma
and three years and four years Bachelor’s Degree Programme respectively,
Regulation 3-C makes similar provisions for running the two years Master’s
Programme in a major discipline, two years Master’s Programme in
Business Administration and one year M.S/M.Tech programme offered by
the University. These Regulations, thus, do not provide for the curriculum
and in fact, in our opinion, contain provisions relating to training and
teaching in connection with the degree/diploma programmes of the
University. The prescriptions in these Regulations are in relation
to the manner in which training and teaching in connection with
degree/diploma programmes is to be conducted, which as per
W.P.(C) 17131/2025 Page 19 of 19
Section 8(1) of the 2019 Act can be provided for by framing Regulations as
well. Thus, submission by learned counsel for the petitioner based on sub-
Section 2 of Section 8 of the 2019 Act to the effect that since the impugned
Regulations prescribe for courses and curriculum, the same could be
prescribed only by framing Ordinances and not by framing Regulations, in
our opinion merits rejection, which is hereby rejected.
43.For the reasons aforesaid, we are not inclined to interfere in this writ
petition, which is hereby dismissed. No order as to costs.
DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ
TEJAS KARIA, J
MARCH 10, 2026
N.Khanna/S.Rawat
Legal Notes
Add a Note....