As per case facts, Innocenti SA filed trademark applications for 'LAMBRETTA'. August Ventures opposed these, claiming prior rights and that Innocenti was a 'pirator'. August Ventures filed Writ Petitions (WP ... 54 and WP 56) challenging the Registrar's acceptance orders and seeking directions for the Registrar to withdraw acceptance under Section 19 of the Trade Marks Act. Innocenti filed an Appeal against the Registrar's refusal of its 'Jambrella' application. The question arose on the interplay between Sections 19 and 21 of the Trade Marks Act, specifically if a third party can compel the Registrar to exercise powers under Section 19 when an opposition remedy under Section 21 is available. Finally, the High Court dismissed the Writ Petitions, stating Section 19 is discretionary for the Registrar and does not allow third-party applications to invoke it, with Section 21 being the appropriate remedy. The Court also set aside the refusal of Innocenti's 'Jambrella' application due to inconsistent stands by the Registrar and remanded all related matters for a consolidated decision after hearing both parties.