As per case facts, land was acquired by the State Government for Greater Noida. The Special Land Acquisition Officer determined the market value. Aggrieved by this, appellants sought reference under ... the Land Acquisition Act, and the District Judge determined a higher market value with deductions for development and granted solatium and interest. The Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority appealed to the High Court, and the appellants filed cross-appeals for further enhancement. The High Court confirmed the compensation but allegedly did not consider the cross-objections filed by the appellants. A review petition was also dismissed. The question arose whether the High Court failed in its duty to consider the cross-objections filed by the appellants, which, according to the Civil Procedure Code, have the trappings of a regular appeal and require full consideration. Finally, the Supreme Court, referencing precedents, held that the High Court was obligated to consider all issues raised, including cross-objections. Since this obligation was not discharged, the matter was remanded back to the High Court for fresh adjudication on the grounds raised in the cross-objections.