Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
As per the case facts the appellant the defendant challenged a High Court judgment that modified a lower court's decree in a suit for mesne profits filed by the respondent-plaintiff
...for unauthorized occupation after a lease expired The appeal contested the application of limitation periods for mesne profits The question arose whether the suit for mesne profits should be governed by Article or the residuary Article of the Limitation Act and whether any part of the claim was consequently time-barred Finally the Supreme Court dismissed the appeals The Court clarified that damages for unauthorized occupation should not be considered profits received under Article and thus the residuary Article of the Limitation Act should apply This decision affirmed that the suit for mesne profits was not time-barred