As per case facts, this appeal arose from directions issued by a Single Judge in an Execution Petition aimed at enforcing an Arbitral Award that had already been confirmed as ... final by the Supreme Court after multiple challenges. The appellants, being the respondents in the original Execution Petition, challenged these specific directions. The question arose whether the directions given in an Execution Petition by the Single Judge were appealable orders or judgments under the Commercial Courts Act or the Code of Civil Procedure, given that the respondent raised a preliminary objection on the appeal's maintainability. Finally, the Court held that the appeal was not maintainable, reiterating that only orders specifically enumerated under Order 43 of the Civil Procedure Code or Section 37 of the Arbitration Act are appealable, and the directions in question did not fall within these categories, nor could they be termed as a decree of the Court.