As per case facts, petitioners challenged an order dated July 2, 2025, and related proceedings, seeking to quash them and direct the University to recommend their institutes for B.Ed. counseling ... for the academic session 2025-26. Their affiliation was put on hold by the University based on criminal cases and Standing Committee recommendations, despite having NCTE recognition. The University argued that its inspection reports were unsatisfactory, a letter from NCTE appeared forged, and criminal investigations were ongoing against these institutions. The question arose whether the University was justified in refusing affiliation to these institutions, given their NCTE recognition but also considering the irregularities, suspected forged documents, and active criminal investigations. Finally, the High Court dismissed all the writ petitions, affirming the University's decision to deny affiliation. The court found that these institutions, described as "commercial shops," failed to meet the necessary conditions and were facing serious criminal charges, some even attempting to forge official documents. Petitioners were directed to refund fees to any admitted students and ordered to pay a cost of twenty-five thousand rupees each. The interim orders were vacated, and students were barred from examinations until affiliation was granted. The court also highlighted the need for NCTE to improve its oversight.