As per case facts, a dispute arose from an agreement related to telecasting a cricket tournament, where the appellants claimed loss of advertising revenue due to the respondent's actions concerning ... signal distribution. The appellants initiated a suit in India, seeking damages, while the respondent subsequently filed an action in the English Court for an outstanding amount. The appellants sought an anti-suit injunction in the Indian court to prevent the respondent from proceeding with the English action, arguing that the Indian court was the natural forum and the English proceedings were vexatious. A Single Judge granted this injunction, but it was later vacated by a Division Bench. The question arose whether the Division Bench of the High Court erred in vacating the anti-suit injunction, which restrained the respondent from pursuing action in the English Court, given that the English Court was the parties' chosen forum. Finally, the Supreme Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the High Court's decision. The Court found no valid reasons to grant an anti-suit injunction, noting that the parties had agreed to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the English Courts and that such an order would breach the agreement.