As per the case facts, the case involved miscellaneous applications within curative petitions, which were themselves part of review petitions. The central issue was the procedure followed when the registration ... of a curative petition was denied, especially given that significant time had passed since these petitions were initially filed. The question arose whether the method used to deny the registration of curative petitions adhered to the Supreme Court Rules and if the Court should send the matter back for reconsideration or decide it directly. Finally, the Supreme Court overturned the order that had refused to register the curative petition, ruling that it violated the Court's rules. However, recognizing the substantial time that had elapsed since the petitions were filed, the Court chose not to send the matter back. Instead, it reviewed the initial orders, the review court’s decision, and the curative petitions itself, concluding that there was no valid reason for further intervention.