As per the case facts, the High Court had granted bail to the respondent accused under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. This decision was challenged in the Supreme Court due ... to concerns about the High Court overlooking relevant material and the accused's subsequent conduct. The question arose whether the High Court was justified in granting bail to the respondent when relevant material was overlooked and adverse supervening circumstances existed. Finally, the Supreme Court quashed and set aside the High Court's order, directing the respondent to surrender. The Court clarified that its observations were limited to examining the infirmity in the bail order and the respondent's conduct, and would not be an opinion on the case's merits. It also stated that the respondent could apply for fresh bail if new circumstances arose.