As per case facts, the appellants were convicted by a Special Judge for offenses including rape, gang rape, and criminal intimidation. The victim alleged a love affair with one appellant ... leading to sexual acts and a gang rape under threat of viral videos. The trial court, however, acquitted them under the POCSO and IT Act, noting the victim was a major and her testimony regarding gang rape lacked medical corroboration and contained omissions. These appeals challenge their convictions. The question arose whether the victim's uncorroborated testimony, despite inconsistencies and absence of physical injury, was sufficient to sustain conviction for rape and gang rape when medical evidence did not support a recent forceful sexual act. Finally, the High Court determined that the victim's testimony, rife with omissions and without medical corroboration, particularly concerning injuries in a rough terrain, did not inspire confidence. The court noted her silence and the medical officer's finding of "non-consistent with recent sexual intercourse" and an old hymen tear, indicating habitual sexual activity. Consequently, the court concluded that the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt, leading to the acquittal of the appellants.