Welcome back to Caseon!
Log in today and discover expertly curated legal audios and how our AI-powered, tailor-made responses can empower you to navigate the complexities of your case.
Stay ahead of the curve—don’t miss out on the insights that could transform your legal practice!
Respondent No herein as the Plaintiff filed a suit T S No of for a declaration of his title to the suit property for confirmation of his possession over it
...and if it were to be found that the plaintiff had been dispossessed from the plaint schedule property during the pendency of the suit for the grant of a decree for recovery of possession through the process of court for a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his peaceful possession of the plaint schedule property and for other incidental reliefs The suit was filed against two defendants the Divisional Forest Officer and the State of Bihar who are respondents and herein Defendants and filed a written statement denying the claim of title and possession by the plaintiff They pleaded that the property was vested forest having been notified as such under Section of the Forest Act which remained vested in the State that the plaintiff had no cause of action and that the suit was not maintainable for want of notice under Section of the Code of Civil Procedure The suit went to trial Evidence was closed Arguments concluded Judgement was reserved