As per the case facts, individuals accused of money laundering had been denied bail by lower courts, which found initial evidence of their guilt. The appeal concerned whether they met ... the strict conditions for bail under money laundering laws. The question arose whether the accused had fulfilled the two essential conditions for securing bail under a specific money laundering law. Finally, the Supreme Court rejected all appeals, upholding the lower court's decision. It confirmed that the accused had not met the stringent bail conditions required by the money laundering act. The Court found no error in the lower court's initial finding of guilt. It also affirmed that the right to a speedy trial applies to these cases, but noted the accused must still meet the specific bail requirements. The primary accused was ordered to surrender immediately.