As per case facts, the accused was convicted for the double murder of Manish Babubhai and Kaushal Rasikbhai by administering poison. The motive stemmed from the accused's suspicion of an ... illicit affair between his wife and Manish. The accused invited the deceased to his home for fruit beer, where he mixed poisonous Sodium Nitrite, leading to their deaths. The appellant appealed the conviction, arguing the circumstantial evidence was not conclusively proven. The question arose whether the prosecution established a complete chain of circumstances proving the accused's guilt, including motive, procurement of poison, and opportunity. Finally, the Court found that the incriminating circumstances, such as the motive, the accused's access to Sodium Nitrite from his workplace, purchasing fruit beer, and inviting the deceased, were firmly established. The delay in reporting was also explained. The Court concluded that the evidence formed an irresistible chain pointing solely to the appellant's guilt, upholding the double murder conviction.