As per case facts, appellants, engaged as Daily Rated Mazdoors since 2014, were disengaged in 2017. They claimed continuous service of over 240 days, making their termination illegal due to ... non-compliance with ID Act Sections 25F, 25G, and 25N, including retention of juniors. The Labour Court ordered their reinstatement with back wages. The respondent challenged this award, while appellants sought its implementation. The Single Judge, however, remanded the matter for fresh adjudication. The question arose whether the Single Judge's remand order was justified given the Labour Court's reasoned award and the limited scope of writ court interference. Finally, the High Court found the Labour Court's findings of continuous service and illegal retrenchment to be supported by evidence. It ruled that the Single Judge's remand, without finding perversity in the Labour Court's award, was impermissible. Consequently, the High Court set aside the Single Judge's judgment and affirmed the Labour Court's award.