As per case facts, petitioners' predecessors were settled land, paid rent, and recorded as raiyats. Later, the State claimed the land vested. Petitioners' Title Suit for title and injunction was ... decreed in their favor and upheld on appeal, becoming final. Their requests for Records of Rights (RoR) correction based on this decree were ignored, leading them to the Tribunal. The Tribunal dismissed their application, declaring the Civil Court's decree a nullity due to Section 57B of the West Bengal Estates Acquisition Act, 1953. The question arose whether the Civil Court's decree was a nullity, if the Bihar Private Forests Act, 1947 applied, and if the State was estopped from claiming the land vested. Finally, the Court found the Tribunal acted without jurisdiction. It held the Civil Court's binding decree was not covered by Section 57B, making it valid. The Bihar Act was deemed inapplicable due to the State's contradictory claims and lack of notification. Additionally, the State was estopped as it consistently accepted rent from petitioners as raiyats. The Block Land and Land Reforms Officer was directed to correct the RoR within three months.