As per the case facts, the appeals challenged an order from the National Green Tribunal concerning the felling of trees of prohibited species. The State sought to continue granting licenses ... due to the availability of timber and for sustainable development. The reason for the appeal to the Supreme Court was to overturn the National Green Tribunal's orders related to these permissions. The question arose whether sanction for felling trees could continue while adequately addressing environmental concerns. Finally, the Supreme Court allowed the appeals, setting aside the National Green Tribunal's orders. It directed the State Government to ensure strict adherence to the conditions in a notification for granting felling permissions, specifically requiring applicants to plant 10 trees for every one felled and maintain them for five years. The Court emphasized the State's responsibility towards environmental protection and sustainable development.