As per case facts, WinZO Games, a digital gaming platform, faced an FIR after a complainant, Aastha Sood, found her PAN card misused on WinZO and Real11, leading to TDS ... entries. Her PAN was leaked on `www.scribd.com`. WinZO proactively contacted the complainant and cooperated to resolve the issue, even providing details of alleged perpetrators. The complainant initially clarified WinZO was not the perpetrator, but the FIR was still registered against WinZO and Scribd. WinZO appealed to the High Court to quash the FIR against it. The question arose whether the FIR allegations, even at face value, constituted cheating or cybercrime against WinZO, given the complainant's statements and WinZO's cooperation. Finally, the High Court ruled that offences under Section 420 IPC and Sections 66C, 66D of the IT Act did not apply to WinZO, as there was no dishonest intention or transaction from their end. The court noted the complainant didn't name WinZO as perpetrator and WinZO had cooperated. The FIR was quashed qua the petitioner, allowing other proceedings to continue.