As per the case facts, a challan was presented regarding a crime committed to destabilize the country through a series of bomb blasts, including one in a crowded market. Several ... accused persons were charged with various offenses, and some were declared proclaimed offenders. The question arose regarding the sufficiency and admissibility of evidence, especially in cases of conspiracy and confessional statements, to prove the guilt of the accused. Finally, the Supreme Court analyzed various aspects of evidence, including the admissibility of confessions against co-accused under Section 10 of the Evidence Act. The court deliberated on the concept of common design in a conspiracy and how it does not always require direct proof of agreement. The court also held that trustworthy police official testimonies can form the basis of conviction, and the acquittal of co-accused does not automatically imply the innocence of others if evidence against them is substantial. The judgment detailed the roles of individual accused and concluded with their sentencing to imprisonment for life without remission, extending to natural life.