As per case facts, an intellectually disabled girl went missing and was later found having been sexually assaulted. CCTV footage showed Mool Chandra leading her, and both Mool Chandra and ... Bhup Singh were implicated. Medical examination three days later was inconclusive for rape, but Mool Chandra had no forensic link to the sexual assault. Mool Chandra appealed his conviction for kidnapping, rape, and gang rape. The central legal question was whether the evidence, particularly the circumstantial and electronic evidence, proved the charges against him beyond reasonable doubt. Finally, the High Court set aside Mool Chandra's rape, gang rape (Sections 376(2)(1), 376-D IPC), and 366-A IPC convictions due to lack of forensic linkage to sexual assault. However, his conviction for kidnapping (Section 363 IPC) was affirmed, as he took an intellectually disabled person from lawful guardianship without consent. Since he had already served his sentence for kidnapping, he was ordered to be released.